Free Essays on Open Lunch Survey

Open Lunch The Students’ Point of View â€Å"Lunch period is a closed period which means that students cannot leave the school premises. Once a student arrives on school property they may not leave the campus grounds without a permit signed by an administrator or school nurse,† (the Simley High School Student Handbook.) According to a survey given to Smiley High School students, 98% of the students surveyed think we should be able to leave for open lunch. â€Å" It would be nice to go somewhere else and get a different variety of foods,† one student responded. Only 2% of the students surveyed think we should not have an open lunch. â€Å" It would be so hectic in the parking lot for kids to leave, and by the time you got somewhere, there would be no time to eat.† With open lunch, the option of either eating at a fast food restaurant or at home opens up to students. Sixty-six percent of the students surveyed thought that they would eat at home. â€Å" So many people would go to the fast food restaurants that they would be too crowded for my pleasure,† one student responded. The other 34% of the students surveyed thought that they would prefer to eat at a fast food restaurant. â€Å" Fast food is closer,† was a common response among students. A very controversial topic in dealing with open lunch is whether or not to give each grade the privilege to leave or to only allow the upperclassman to leave. The results show that 95% of the students surveyed do not think all grades should have the opportunity to leave for lunch. â€Å" Just Juniors and Seniors should be able to leave, it should be a privilege everyone gets to have once they are upperclassman, then students would appreciate and respect it more than if they were underclassman, responded one student. The remaining 5% of the students surveyed supported all grades being allowed to leave for open lunch. â€Å" It’s only fair for every... Free Essays on Open Lunch Survey Free Essays on Open Lunch Survey Open Lunch The Students’ Point of View â€Å"Lunch period is a closed period which means that students cannot leave the school premises. Once a student arrives on school property they may not leave the campus grounds without a permit signed by an administrator or school nurse,† (the Simley High School Student Handbook.) According to a survey given to Smiley High School students, 98% of the students surveyed think we should be able to leave for open lunch. â€Å" It would be nice to go somewhere else and get a different variety of foods,† one student responded. Only 2% of the students surveyed think we should not have an open lunch. â€Å" It would be so hectic in the parking lot for kids to leave, and by the time you got somewhere, there would be no time to eat.† With open lunch, the option of either eating at a fast food restaurant or at home opens up to students. Sixty-six percent of the students surveyed thought that they would eat at home. â€Å" So many people would go to the fast food restaurants that they would be too crowded for my pleasure,† one student responded. The other 34% of the students surveyed thought that they would prefer to eat at a fast food restaurant. â€Å" Fast food is closer,† was a common response among students. A very controversial topic in dealing with open lunch is whether or not to give each grade the privilege to leave or to only allow the upperclassman to leave. The results show that 95% of the students surveyed do not think all grades should have the opportunity to leave for lunch. â€Å" Just Juniors and Seniors should be able to leave, it should be a privilege everyone gets to have once they are upperclassman, then students would appreciate and respect it more than if they were underclassman, responded one student. The remaining 5% of the students surveyed supported all grades being allowed to leave for open lunch. â€Å" It’s only fair for every... Free Essays on Open Lunch Survey Open Lunch The Students’ Point of View â€Å"Lunch period is a closed period which means that students cannot leave the school premises. Once a student arrives on school property they may not leave the campus grounds without a permit signed by an administrator or school nurse,† (the Simley High School Student Handbook.) According to a survey given to Smiley High School students, 98% of the students surveyed think we should be able to leave for open lunch. â€Å" It would be nice to go somewhere else and get a different variety of foods,† one student responded. Only 2% of the students surveyed think we should not have an open lunch. â€Å" It would be so hectic in the parking lot for kids to leave, and by the time you got somewhere, there would be no time to eat.† With open lunch, the option of either eating at a fast food restaurant or at home opens up to students. Sixty-six percent of the students surveyed thought that they would eat at home. â€Å" So many people would go to the fast food restaurants that they would be too crowded for my pleasure,† one student responded. The other 34% of the students surveyed thought that they would prefer to eat at a fast food restaurant. â€Å" Fast food is closer,† was a common response among students. A very controversial topic in dealing with open lunch is whether or not to give each grade the privilege to leave or to only allow the upperclassman to leave. The results show that 95% of the students surveyed do not think all grades should have the opportunity to leave for lunch. â€Å" Just Juniors and Seniors should be able to leave, it should be a privilege everyone gets to have once they are upperclassman, then students would appreciate and respect it more than if they were underclassman, responded one student. The remaining 5% of the students surveyed supported all grades being allowed to leave for open lunch. â€Å" It’s only fair for every...

Spreading Terror essays

Spreading Terror essays With the War on Terrorism lasting about 5 months, it has moved on from Afghanistan to many other locations. In his State of the Union speech on Wednesday January 30th, President Bush said that the war was not over and that we should not expect a short war on terror. President Bush and the rest of the United States are now looking at other countries such as Iraq, Iran and North Korea. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic," Bush said. President Bush singled out Iraq, Iran and North Korea as being the main possible producers of weapons of mass destruction. The axis of evil, as Bush called them are not being shunned out of the United States. "We'll tell you what we think, and we'll tell you we're ready to discuss these issues," Boucher said referring to the discussions between Iraq, Iran, and North Korea with the United States. Diplomacy itself is about to change. Is America ready to fight a war against multiple enemies should the need come? "When we're called upon by the president to do whatever, we'll be ready to do that," General Richard Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a press conference. The countries that Bush singled out are not taking his words lightly. "This statement of President Bush is stupid and a statement that does not befit the leader of the biggest state in the world," Iraqi Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan said. North Korea also voiced their opinion about being called an axis of evil. In one of North Koreas newspapers it was written that President Bushs words were merely loudmouthed threats meant to justify U.S. military presence in South Korea. The future ...

Homeland Security - Capstone Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Homeland Security - Capstone - Essay Example Ten years later, we are still looking for answers although much speculation and some verified facts have come out for public viewing since then. There are things we know for sure now – and then things we can only wonder about because there is no one available to answer the questions that only the dead know. But we have been able to piece some pieces of information together, only to come up with more questions, some of which we really dont want to ask because the answer could mean we were betrayed by our own government who did not heed the warning signals. For instance, Phillipine intelligence had indicated to the United States that there was an attack being planned to hit the Twin Towers and other well-known sites. The plot, Project Bojinka, was known about as early as 1995. â€Å"Project Bojinka was known by the CIA, and the FBI. It was described in court documents in the trial in New York of Ramzi Yousef, and Abdul Murad for their participation in the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993† (Ahmed, 2002). Additionally, FBI agents were aware of suspicious Arab-Americans learning how to fly planes in certain parts of the country. Special Agent Robert G. Wright Jr. said the Offices of the Directors of the FBI threated Wright with criminal prosecution if he said anything to the media about the prior knowledge the FBI had of the attacks against the United States, (Vernon, 2002). Special Agent Wright was demoted to doing paperwork at a desk in the office, and was scheduled to testify against the FBI for not saving thousands of innocent people of September 11, 2001, (Vernon, 2002). The purpose of this study has been to determine if there were any precautions we could have taken ahead of the event that would have prevented such an occurrence. We then look at what we have done since the attack to prevent further occurrences of terrorism